
BUY
LOCAL BOOKS
C L I C K
 |
books reviewed
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
A STORY OF THE HOUSE
The House
The History of the House of Representatives
Robert V. Remini
Smithsonian Books 614 pages
$34.95
When the framers of
the U. S. Constitution set out to create a new
government with three branches, most of the participants
envisioned a
legislature of the elite, not trusting in the people to make
intelligent
choices. It was James Madison who led the fight for a democratic
House of
Representatives elected directly by the people.
During the 1st Congress, Madison was considered the “first man”
in the
House and he feared any encroachment on its power by the executive
branch
which actually occurred during Washington’s first term. Little did
he know
that that battle would continue until the present day.
Indeed, as this review is being written, a battle now looms over
that same
fear, that the President is assuming too much authority, taking
away from
the Congress. Dr. Remini¹s history tells the story of that
enduring conflict
along with vivid descriptions of House leaders and personalities
who brought
us to the present day under J. Dennis Hastert and this Congress’
relationship with President George W. Bush.
Dr. Remini, a foremost historian, was chosen to write this book
for the
Library of Congress. His task was formidable. How do you pick and
choose in
one volume what is notable and important in over 200 years of a
body which
changes very two years? Which period is more important
historically than any
other?
It is a tightly written and highly readable narrative in which
the author
concentrates on the activities of The House against the backdrop
of American
history. It portrays the bitter and the sweet of American
politics, its
heroes and its true leaders as well as those characters of
incompetence and
mediocrity, of bombast and dishonesty.
After Madison we read how Andrew Jackson battled with those
giants of
legislation: Henry Clay, Daniel Webster and John C. Calhoun. After
Jackson
the lower house of Congress was thick in the fray in an effort to
prevent
civil war and after the war when it was dominated by one party.
It describes the impeachment of Andrew Johnson (and later Bill
Clinton and
the near impeachment of Richard M. Nixon.) The narrative does not
stay on
any one period too long but it does describe in detail how some
leaders
managed to make an impact of the House and its role in American
history.
Notable among these were Joseph G. Cannon, Nicholas Longworth, Sam
Rayburn
and Newt Gingrich. The account gives attention to the rise of
women, such as
Shirley Chisolm.
Some parts of the history become exciting, not just when House
members
became violent or corrupt, but when they displayed marvelous
political
skills. When President John F. Kennedy wanted to discuss
legislation with
Rayburn, the speaker cut him off, reminding him that that was
Congress’
prerogative. Later, when it looked as though the House would block
much of
Kennedy’s program, it was Rayburn who, by sheer power of personal
persuasion, swayed the Congress to give the young President’s
proposals a
fair chance.
Also, it describes how Gingrich (with the help of Wyoming
Congressman Dick
Cheney) changed the whole tenor of House politics by deliberately
using the
technique of personal attack.
When dealing with contemporary accounts this is one of the most
objective
political histories published in a long time. Dr. Remini lets the
facts
speak for themselves. He concludes with a summary of how The House
has
changed since the days of powdered wigs. It is far more democratic
as the
present body includes women, minorities and people from all walks
of life.
During the last half of the 20th century, many members have made
it a
career, relying on the vast powers of incumbency to perpetuate
their stays
in office, contradicting the spirit of the framers who set up
two-year
elections to keep them close to the people. Congressmen aren’t
working as
hard. Most of them only spend two days and one night in town,
campaigning
more than doing the people¹s business. They use free TV and spend
taxpayer
money on getting reelected. Presently, when they leave it is
because of
their choice (many to become lobbyists) rather than the people’s.
Too, since Gingrich, it has transformed the once civil and
respectful
fraternity into a vitriolic and bitter bunch. Madison would be
appalled.
Henry Clay, “the great compromiser” would have had to change his
tactics.
Yet, they are not all bad guys. Over the course of history, the
House of
Representatives has served the country well. This is their story
and it is a
good one.
- Bryan Harrison
______________________________________________
ANDREW JACKSON: DRAMATIC HISTORY
Andrew Jackson
His Life and Times
H. W. Brands
Doubleday 620 pages $35
Of all the discoverable details about Andrew Jackson most of them
are
recounted here, but this is not a book of detailed facts, rather a
dramatic
story of a pre-teen war veteran who came to power and influence like
few
Americans ever have, painted on a backdrop of illuminating history.
It is dramatic because of its dramatis personae, especially
Jackson, who
fought and struggled against life and carved himself a path to fame
and
glory. His nemeses, John Quincy Adams, John C. Calhoun and Henry
Clay loom large in the pages of Jacksonian history as does Thomas
Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, Sam Houston and Aaron Burr.
What makes this a singular biography is the backdrop, beginning
with
Jackson’s Scotch-Irish roots, the vivid portrait of early American
life, an
understanding of the Indians whose battles figured so much in the
frontier
life and times, and the political canopy which pictures America’s
rise to
democracy.
The revolutionary war came to the Waxhaws on the North
Carolina/South
Carolina border and 12-year old Andrew was caught up in it and even
could
have been considered a hero. Orphaned, he blew an inheritance in the
saloons
and on the gaming tables of Charleston and began a law practice in
Salisbury, N. C., where he scandalized the community.
Most of his wild oats were sown by the time he reached middle
Tennessee
which itself was wild and dangerous as its early inhabitants were
always
under threat by hostile Indians. He was an astute politician as long
as he
could make things happen and was considered a good judge despite
little
legal experience. One of Tennessee’s first Congressmen, he became
bored with
non-action politics and quit. Although a good businessman he had his
ups and
downs as a planter and soon developed a pattern for dueling and
foolish
scrapes.
His great love was the military where his penchant for fighting
was
expressed in a positive way. Although usually ignored in books about
military genius, his tactics and strategy were textbook worthy and
more
importantly produced the desired results. The battle of New Orleans
was one
of the most brilliant and successfully fought battles--ever.
Indeed, Jackson’s life was notable because of his fights. He not
only
fought battles with the Creeks, the Seminoles and the British
militarily,
but he fought with the Spanish over his right to go into their
territory,
with civil authorities who interfered with his military rule in New
Orleans
and with politicians who became threatened by his rising
popularity.
He was not a compromiser but a man of conviction. He carried his
convictions to the U.S. Senate where, once again, became frustrated
with
inaction, and finally to the White House where his great fight with
Nicholas
Biddle defeated the Bank of the United States and insisted that the
federal
union would be preserved. Politically he fought with Adams, Calhoun,
Clay
and others and usually came out on top.
It is all here. Brands’ biography doesn’t gloss over Jackson’s
complex
personality, but the facts alone permit a great appreciation of the
man and
his achievements. There was probably never a president more popular
with the
public, with the possible exception of Franklin Roosevelt, than
Andrew
Jackson, primarily because he brought the government to the people.
The U.
S. became a fully democratic nation under Jackson and no other
figure in
early American history did as much to promote democracy and bring to
an end
class rule.
After reading this biography, it is hard to say whether one would
or
would not have personally liked Jackson, but one has to admire him
and
recognize his great contribution to American history. He was always
a forceful American and a
tireless patriot.
This is a big book, full of the life and times, and highly
readable.
Bryan Harrison
________________________________________________
YOUNG PATRIOTS MAKE
A NATION
Young Patriots
Charles Cerami
Sourcebooks, Inc.
354 Pages $24.95
The body politic that waged the American
Revolutionary War remained in
the years following a loose conjunction of state
representatives who looked
after local interests rather than seeking a national
consensus. The money
was no good. There was armed rebellion. There was no
strong leadership to
guide the path of the nation, even if it could be called
a nation.
Although many of the war’s military and political
leaders saw the need for
a strong central government, it fell on two young
patriots, James Madison
and Alexander Hamilton, to pave the way for central
government to revise,
and eventually replace, the ineffective confederation
and the “articles”
which gave it legality.
This is the story of what, in the beginning and all
through the process of
creating and ratifying a constitution, seemed a virtual
impossibility. The
story as it is told here is fast-paced narrative that
can be read like a
thriller. This is not textbook history.
Clearly Madison is far more the hero than Hamilton,
but both men, in their
thirties and neither yet household names, had a vision
for their country and
although differing in details were equally devoted to a
strong and effective
national government.
Young Madison’s great attributes were careful,
detailed planning, shrewd
and calculated political maneuvering and, above all,
perseverance. Madison
had won the respect of George Washington, who in the
eyes of Americans could
do no wrong. After the first attempt at getting the
states together failed,
a second try, with Washington¹s blessing, brought the
framers of the
Constitution together at Philadelphia.
There the great issues of the fledgling country and
its politics in
disarray began to forge a document that would last until
the present day.
Madison’s great political skills enabled them to skirt
the issue of slavery
in order to keep the Convention from splitting up before
anything could be
done. He also fought for the principle that the common
man must decide how
to be governed when the prevailing attitude was that the
people were too
ignorant to govern themselves.
Hamilton was extreme in his views for a
near-monarchial type of government
but it was, although agreeable, too utopian for
possibility. Hamilton was
hampered during the convention by New York politics but
remained and worked
tirelessly for a central government.
Charles Cerami’s book reveals the how the delegates
went from enthusiasm
to near giving up, how they struggled through the
exhausting hot summer days
to hammer out compromises.
The familiar heroes are here. Washington, an aging and
ailing Benjamin
Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, who kept abreast an ocean
away, and a
recalcitrant Patrick Henry who opposed the movement from
beginning to end.
But it was lesser-known men who put the experiment
together. Roger
Sherman, John Dickinson, Henry Knox and South Carolina’s
John Rutledge and
Charles and Charles Cotesworth Pinckney and some who
were hardly heard from
before or since.
The narrative digresses in places, looking into the
future, but the main
story line maintains the history of the making of the
constitution, with its
special emphasis on Madison and Hamilton’s
contributions, from Shay’s
rebellion to Washington’s first term as President.
We learn how Hamilton and Madison, who later became
enemies, sacrificed
their time to compose the Federalist Papers and how
Madison came to produce
The Bill of Rights.
Young Patriots is good, readable history.
Bryan Harrison
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |

|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|